![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Day 1: Face up to itBrief of the afternoon given by Thor Blomfield, Chairperson NCPTA: Session structure
Bill Blaikie explained a methodology of discussion, and then invited the delegation to break into groups of 4-6 people for approximately 15 minutes. The groups had to choose their top 3 wishes of what they would like to see happen in circus and physical theatre. The following lists were facilitated by Finch who asked each group to list their 1st wish then around the groups for their 2nd and 3rd wish. Blaikie copied all the groups' wishes onto the white board. Wish 1: Maintain and Foster Diversity, Youth Training and Education, Internal industry communication, Unlimited Government Funding, Packed Houses, Larger Scope for Conference, Passion and Risk Taking, Greater Access to Resources, High level Training Facilities Available to Individuals, More Kids Exposed to Circus, More Support Understanding and Validation for Clowns, Opportunities for Parents,Attention to Details of Quality and Craft, Vision, Professional Respect/Raising Profile Wish 2: Training, Research and Development, NICA and NON-NICA, High Class Website and Network, Cross Arts co-ordination between artists and companies, International Passport (Hostels and Work Permits) Loose Body for Seeking Accreditation and Insurance, Perform for the Dole, More Touring for Small Companies, More Exposure Outside Normal Circuits, Cheaper/Free Flights for Artists, Knowledge of Resources, Exploration of Combining Safety, Training and Creative Risks, Presence of Indigenous Culture in Discussion and Work in the Industry. Wish 3: Archiving, Foam Pits, Physically Risk Free Environment, Self Sustainable Community Work, Giving and Receiving, Honest Feedback, Benefit Packages (retirement and retraining), Raise Status/Profile, Respect and Value, Injury Free (including physical and emotional injury), Using Globalisation Positively, Cultural Navigating - Artists as Navigators of Cultural Leadership, More Experimentation. Seven different discussion topics were formed from the wish categories, with each discussion group lead by a targeted facilitator. Guidelines for facilitators were as follows:
Discussion groups and facilitators:
Groups broke off into different locations around the Powerhouse for approximately 1 hour. The conference was then brought to a close for the day, with group summaries to be presented in the Taking the ball session (Day 2). General notes from some of the discussion groups have been included here. The notes were taken by volunteers hence the different styles - notes were then fleshed out for the Taking the ball sessions.
Group 3: Art and CraftThe session began with the group members describing where they were from and why they were interested in this topic. Pushing the boundaries: Blomfield was interested in taking circus out of the trick zone and looking at what you can do with these tricks and how they can be used theatrically. Diversifying skills: Wayne Specht, Axis Theatre agreed with Blomfield and will be working with Legs on the Wall on a collaboration piece next year. Specht encourages performers to further develop their skills. He believes a physical theatre performer cannot just rely on one skill alone and needs to explore many other avenues and diversify. These skills will make them more valuable as a performer within a company. The group also discussed the lost clown. Many people were worried that the traditional and pure clown has faded from circus and physical theatre for a number of reasons. People were interested in why and how to bring back the clown in it's pure form. Training and knowledge: Training and knowledge is seen as a very important background for successful creative development. Types of acting training for physical theatre needs to be looked at closely. Commedia Dell arte was recommended as a good from of acting training for physical theatre. Cross-arts collaboration: directors. There was a general consensus that working across the arts was the way to go. Not to limit circus and physical theatre to purely trick based entertainment but to work with actors, designers, directors, film people, musicians, multi-media, artists and photographers and fashion designers. It was suggested that a database of people who work in these fields be created. The database would also include details for riggers, sound and light operators, people involved in production and administration. This would generate cross-arts involvement and help people find the right people to work with generating employment. The discussion site that Mike Finch set up through Bathurst University was mentioned as a model that is already being used to connect people. This is an e-mail newsletter that goes out to people who studied in Bathurst. Vision to fruition: the creative development process A lot of people were interested in looking at how the creative development phase works. This could be done by publishing case studies of creative development processes on the net. It was suggested that we hold a creative pow-wow for directors. This could be a weekend where directors come together to discuss the processes involved with working with physical theatre. Many of the group members were interested in mentoring for young and upcoming directors. This could be done through the Internet. It could also be an item on the agenda for the next circus and physical theatre conference. The time and money needed for creative development was another issue. The theory of creative development was discussed, encouraging papers and modules to be written about how companies work toward their shows. A lot of companies can't afford the time and money to properly work through the creative development and therefore the end result suffers. Anna Yen talked of how important it is as a director to allow the performers to discover the work themselves through finding and exposing their vulnerability. Shelalagh McGovern talked of the experience of using a theatrical director to work with a physical theatre show. Difficulties arose due to a lack of understanding of the physical work by the director. Theatre directors who work with physical theatre need to have a good understanding of the skills, the difficulty and the physical strength and concentration needed for performing tricks. Group 4: AdvocacyBill Blaikie: SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) Pioneering work: centralized contact where communication can process and flow Geographical limitations: Block between physical theatre network and larger organisations. Legs on the Wall did not have profile until director came on board - got a winning performance and then the doors opened. Problem of networking. Don't want doors to close with a poor production. Workshops/teaching in schools. Critical objectives: Lobby the Australian Council for the next person on theatre board to be a circus artist or administrator. People to chose by states. Whip round the circus conference for volunteers for the peer assessment process (people need to know).Make people aware Advocate for industry not just for MOF. Ask senior companies to form a peak body and meet twice a year to discuss issues that affect everybody (e.g. Oz, Legs, Rock n Roll), and develop formal communication avenues. Find funding to create a job for somebody to link/network/access/collaborate. Mobile training unit for the "Community Services" - not just individual. Group 5: DiversityPresent: Antonella Casella, Andrea, Godfrey, Thenmaire, Robbie Hoad, Tina. Discussion points Resource access:
Artists:
Written/verbal physical tradition:
Power
SWOT Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Threats:
Proposals for the Association:
Group 6: TrainingFacilitator: Anni Davey Present: Pam Creed, Nicki Ashton, Doban Nicoll, Tim Smyth (Sydney institute of Sport), Annabel Arndt, Ross Vegas, Bernie Sabat, Helen Selensky, Sherelle Dolphin, Guaug Rong Lu. Discussion about accreditation:
Database discussion:
Training development:
Training styles:
SWOT:
Group 7: Youth trainingFacilitator: Michelle Vickers SWOT: Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Opportunities:
Threats:
Key issues:
Touring training proposal: Strengths:
Opportunities:
Community networking:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
:: TOP ::
This project has been assisted by the Federal Government through the Australia Council, its arts funding and advisory body. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||